The 2000s heralded the internet’s mass adoption in Bharat, transforming obscenity from tangible media to ubiquitous digital content. With broadband penetration rising from 0.2% in 2000 to over 2% by 2010, platforms like Orkut and early YouTube facilitated easy access to explicit material, redefining “lewdness” as instantaneous and borderless.
Tech giants, in their pursuit of global connectivity and user engagement, often host vast amounts of content that may inadvertently clash with local sensibilities, highlighting the need for greater vigilance from users themselves.
Foundations – Defining the Indecent and Obscene Content Read Post »
Do you think than these punishments were sufficient for the heinous crimes done against minors? Comment your opinion and start a discussion.
Part 1 Part 2 Document Evidence: High Court observed the photographs and found that all the photographs are not only
Part 1 Thrilling Story of crime: The Secret Operation of A1 and A2 The heart of this criminal enterprise was
The High Court was therefore not justified in assuming jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC to terminate the trial process initiated by law. In essence, the High Court saw its role not as a second trial court to weigh the evidence, but as a judicial gatekeeper, finding that the threshold for exercising its quashing power had not been met because the charges were supported by prima facie material.
It must be noted that, to be a culprit of such heinous crime, destroying lives of minors and killing their souls, Court initiated a Sou Moto Appeal to enhance the sentence of A2, i.e. Criminal Revision Application No.443 of 2005.
Thus finally 4 accused boys were sentenced for one and half year of RI due to concurrent sentence. Final fine to be paid was sum of Rs. 56,500 (Fifty Six Thousand Five Hundred) by each sentenced accused. This sum shall be deposited in the respective court within three months from the date of judgment and half of the amount shall be given to victim as compensation.
Obscene video of Mansya Kalan, District Hathras: Part 2 Read Post »
Sections 191 (Rioting), 115 (Voluntarily causing hurt), 352 (Intentional insult), 351 (Criminal intimidation), 126 (Wrongful restraint), 78 (Stalking), and 137 (Kidnapping). The judgment also discussed Sections 80 (Dowry death), 103 (Murder), and 86 (Cruelty by husband) in the context of judicial precedents.
Obscene video of Mansya Kalan, District Hathras: Part 1 Read Post »
