Administrative Lex

Administrative Lex, Education Lex

Why India Failed to Implement Hindi as Medium of Instruction in Higher Education? : Case of Gujarat: Part 2

The power of the University to promote the use of Gujarati and/or Hindi as “a medium of instruction” in Section 4(27) has reference only to those institutions which are established and maintained by the University in pursuance of its teaching function and not to colleges over which it exercises a certain amount of control prescribed under the Act by reason of affiliation and the power of the University to hold examinations to lay down as incidental thereto approved courses of studies and to confer degrees etc.

, , ,

Why India Failed to Implement Hindi as Medium of Instruction in Higher Education? : Case of Gujarat: Part 2 Read Post »

Administrative Lex

MRPS Act: Part 3

While the First Appellate Authority can face penalties under Section 10(2) for repeated failures or protecting erring officers, the focus remains on the Designated Officer as the frontline provider. The Act’s framework ensures that defaults lead to financial, disciplinary, and administrative consequences, ultimately strengthening citizen rights to timely services without granting blanket immunity to officials.

, ,

MRPS Act: Part 3 Read Post »

Administrative Lex

MRPS Act: Part 2

As per Section 11 of the MRPS Act, 2015, the Designated Officer or First Appellate Authority, as the case may be, is required to pay the imposed penalty amount within 30 days from the date of receiving the communication or order directing payment. If the penalty remains unpaid within this period, the Competent Authority, typically the head of the department or designated superior officer, is empowered to recover the amount directly from the salary of the concerned officer.

, ,

MRPS Act: Part 2 Read Post »

Administrative Lex, Constitutional law

Constitutional Validity of Service Exam Rules of Karnataka

Article 309 was central to the case because it empowers the State Government to frame rules regulating the recruitment and conditions of service for persons appointed to public services. The court referred to this provision to affirm that the government has the legal authority to unilaterally modify service conditions and prescribe departmental examinations as a prerequisite for promotion.

,

Constitutional Validity of Service Exam Rules of Karnataka Read Post »

Administrative Lex

Case of tomb in High Court Premises: Part 3

As the said site was declared as protected monument u/s 3 of the Ancient Monuments Preservation Act, 1904, in 1921, do we really bound to carry over such declaration by the British Government under AMASR Act without any value assessment on the grounds of cultural, historical, artistic, national pride, etc.? Before such assessment we should take a note that British people were only here to loot this nation and we should not glorify any of such person in any way.

, , ,

Case of tomb in High Court Premises: Part 3 Read Post »

Administrative Lex

Case of tomb in High Court Premises: Part 2

The Article 49 of the Constitution of India specifies that it shall be the obligation of the State to protect every monument or place or object of artistic or historic interest, declared by or under law made by Parliament to be of national importance, from spoliation, disfigurement, destruction, removal, disposal or export, as the case may be.”

, , ,

Case of tomb in High Court Premises: Part 2 Read Post »

Administrative Lex

Case of tomb in High Court Premises: Part 1

1. Under Section 2(j) of the AMASR Act, respondents declared the said tomb and circular vault as ancient monument merely on account of its existence for more than 100 years. The said site does not fulfill any criteria of an ancient monument, as it contains only the remains of close person of the then former Governor. This site does not have any historical, archaeological or artistic significance which need to be protected as ancient monument by respondents on government spending.

, , ,

Case of tomb in High Court Premises: Part 1 Read Post »

Administrative Lex, Animal Juriprudence, Civil Law, Criminal Lex

पशु अतिचार अधिनियम, 1871: धारा 31

यह विस्तृत विश्लेषण सिद्ध करता है कि 1871 का यह अधिनियम अब अप्रासंगिक और दमनकारी हो चुका है। इसे पूरी तरह निरस्त कर एक ऐसे नए “एकीकृत पशु कल्याण और अतिचार प्रबंधन अधिनियम” की आवश्यकता है जो पशुओं को “राजस्व की वस्तु” नहीं, बल्कि “जीवंत प्राणी” माने, किसानों और पशुपालकों के हितों में संतुलन बनाए एवं भारतीय पंचायती राज और डिजिटल इंडिया की सोच को आत्मसात करे।

पशु अतिचार अधिनियम, 1871: धारा 31 Read Post »

Scroll to Top