The passage of the AMASR Act was widely welcomed as a progressive milestone, but over the decades, its limitations have become apparent. Major challenges have emerged in three interrelated domains.
India’s ancient temples, stupas, viharas, gurudwaras, and sacred sites form an intricate tapestry that chronicles the spiritual, architectural, and artistic
Chapter 1: Introduction and Legislative Background Read Post »
Preface India, known as Bharat in her oldest traditions, is a land where temples are not mere structures of stone
Preface: Protecting the Divine: Law, Temples, and Heritage under the AMASR Act, Read Post »
Chapter 4: Conclusion and Suggestions: 4.1 Conclusion: From the above discussion it can be concluded that the said Act has
3.2 Conflict with Constitutional Provisions: Secularism and Communal Harmony: The Supreme Court, while deciding the Ayodhya dispute, made significant observations
Chapter III: Conflicts and Criticisms: 3.1 Conflict Between the Rights and the Places of Worship (Special Provisions) Act. 1991: The
Conflict Between the Rights and the Places of Worship (Special Provisions) Act. 1991 Read Post »
2.3.8 Section 7: Bare Act Provisions: 7. Act to override other enactments.—The provisions of this Act shall have effect notwithstanding
Section 7 of Places of Worship (Special Provisions) Act, 1991 Read Post »
2.3.7 Section 6: Bare Act Provisions: 6. Punishment for contravention of section 3.— (1) Whoever contravenes the provisions of section
Section 6 of Places of Worship (Special Provisions) Act, 1991 Read Post »
2.3.6 Section 5: Bare Act Provision 5. Act not to apply to Ram Janma Bhumi-Babri Masjid.—Nothing contained in this Act
Section 5 of Places of Worship (Special Provisions) Act, 1991 Read Post »
2.3.5 Section 4: Bare Act Provisions: 4. Declaration as to the religious character of certain places of worship and bar
Section 4 of Places of Worship (Special Provisions) Act, 1991 Read Post »
